Structure
Stress-Testing
A structure you have never tested is one you are trusting on faith. We put it under the same pressure a court or creditor would — before one does.
Request a consultationFind the weak point before someone else does.
Most asset protection structures are set up once and left alone. Whether they still work is a question no one asks until a claim forces it.
Stress-testing answers it in advance. We examine an existing trust, LLC, or partnership the way an opposing lawyer would, and tell you plainly where it holds and where it does not.
The weak spots are usually the same ones.
A structure rarely fails for one dramatic reason. It fails on the quiet details.
The grantor kept too much control for the protection to hold.
It was funded too late, or too close to a known problem.
It was set up correctly, then never actually administered.
The paperwork says one thing; the conduct says another.
Reporting lapsed, and the lapse became the opening.
Worth testing if any of this is true.
If the structure matters, it is worth knowing it will hold.
You have a trust or LLC set up years ago and never revisited.
You inherited a structure and no one has explained whether it works.
Your circumstances have changed since it was built.
You are about to rely on it, and want to know it will hold first.
We test against how courts actually rule.
Not theory — the same factors real decisions have turned on: control, intent, and timing.
Review the structure
We read the trust or entity documents, the funding history, and how it has actually been run.
Test it against challenge
We apply the same lenses a court or creditor would: control, timing, substance, and record.
Report where it stands
A plain read of where it would hold and where it would not, with the weak points ranked.
Close the gaps
Concrete fixes for each issue, and a re-test so you know where you stand.
Frequently asked.
Even a well-drafted structure can drift over time.
What decides the outcome is often not how it was drafted, but how it has been run since. Testing looks at both.
Better you find them than a creditor does.
Most issues found early can be fixed. The same issues found late, once a claim has arrived, often cannot.
No. The value of the exercise is candor.
If it holds, we will say so. If it does not, we will say that too, and what to do about it.
Yes. Most of what we review was set up elsewhere.
An independent look is often more useful precisely because it comes from outside.
It is a legal one, not a financial one.
We are not checking your accounts. We are testing whether the structure would survive a challenge.
Know it will hold.
A confidential review of your existing structure — where it stands, and what would make it stronger.
Request a consultation